What to Call the Death-Threat Accomplice...

Oct. 16 Additional Notes:  

In other words, if the DTA gets a slap-on-the-wrist talking to for all of the havoc she has created, then I want the same treatment for the way I stood up to my harassers.  I want to be compensated as though I didn't miss any time at work.  Next time, Save-on-Foods labour relations, take what store managers tell you with a grain of salt.  They may not disclose everything about a given situation just to save their own skin.  Let the defendant speak!!

So you guys suspended me for revealing her true name.  Now you're nagging on me about an anonymous pronoun - DTA?  On top of that, you're saying that I'm fixated on her?  Reading your letter, I get the sense you are making all these warnings about taking legal action and firing me seem like you don't believe I was victimized at all.  Either that or you don't want to deal with the root of the problem.  You really don't care about my medical condition that YOU'VE created.  Aren't you going to ask me how I'm feeling and find a solution to help me feel better?

I'll tell you what?  I'm not going to worry about how you handle the DTA anymore.  The police asked me (on your behalf) what I want.  Let me tell you then.  I want you to acknowledge that you guys made an error in judgment on my actions.  I want to claim the 1-week suspension pay lost in Nov 2018 + the one-day suspension pay that I lost in 2014, minimum.  Your 2018 951 store manager's lack of support (comments to fire me) caused me to reduce my hours due to high stress from my harassers, and the L.R. lady suspended me one month before the new sick leave contract kicked in.  As a result, I was not able to average a high enough of average hours to qualify for sick leave benefits through the company.  I was coping with my stress without the support of anyone to the best of my ability.

On top of that, the union rep wouldn't do anything to argue this point to you on my behalf, and that's what made me snap.  I felt like you guys were imposing a double standard on me.  It was YOUR idea that I was sick and yet you guys were unwilling to help me out financially.  I had to suffer interest and balance transfer fees just to be able to live off of my credit cards.  Not to mention, the president of our local union canceled our over-the-phone meeting that we had planned earlier.  That was the last straw!!

Do you understand why I took it out on your company publically??  If just one of the above-mentioned things did or didn't take place, I wouldn't have thrown you all under the bus like that.  I had no one who would listen to me and believe me.  Now the territorial union rep tells me that I have to "be fit" to work in order for him to be willing to help me out financially??  Are you kidding me??  How long is that going to take?  I'm not even close to being ready to return to the Save-on-Foods working environment.

Now, I have some health complications and you've worsened it by threatening to take legal action against me by sending the police and bailiffs after me.  If you take legal action against my blog comments, I will countersue for your part in contributing to my current bad health.  Please understand how much crap and how long I had to endure it all before passing judgment onto me like this.

I only want what's fair.  You be fair to me and I will stop criticizing you publically.  Quit sending people after me and start listening to what you can do to help me out.  If you still consider me to be one of your employees, then you need to protect me by protecting my health, not just the identity of the DTA.  I'm simply just finding a way to keep my stress level under control so it doesn't further damage my health.