Why the Death-Threat Accomplice Won't Be Punished

I'd like to say something before I begin to hypothesize.  This whole ordeal has been more stressful to me than COVID-19 would be to many others.  It will stay this way for me until this whole situation is resolved in my favour.  I wouldn't know how I would cope if I couldn't express my frustrations through this blog.

When the labour relations person created yet another police complaint towards me, I knew that Save-on-Foods H.O. was still on her side.  He said that it was inappropriate to use the "death-threat accomplice" term.  That made me want to rebel even more.  Firstly, she did help facilitate the death threat towards me, which makes her an accessory to the crime.  Secondly, it was a death threat - something that I thought was real at the time.  Thirdly, she tried baiting me into getting myself in trouble again and again.  Lastly, how else did head office want me to address her as - a sweetheart??  Sugartuuts??  You don't want me to be using her real name but I wasn't about to address her by anything other than some sort of an accomplice.  What Save-on-Foods failed to exhibit is the fact that their improper handling of my situation, caused me great financial and emotional strain.  I'm the victim of her crime and yet, you want to take legal action against me for calling her the DTA??  LOL!!!

The first reason I think the DTA has not gotten disciplined at all via suspension or termination was that when she was pulled up into the boardroom, she must've told the manager this.  She told him that she was just following the death-threat manager's orders to test me.  I've established throughout my blog that she had her own motives (read paragraphs 5 & 6) for sabotaging my career.  Nothing was more apparent than when she tried to set me up again. 

Also, the police officer she sent after me said he was told by the DTA that she tried to stop me from taking pictures of people's shoes (by death-threatening me) was because she felt what I was doing was inappropriate!!  We all know that wasn't the reason why she death-threatened me.

The other reason why I think she got away unscathed was because someone from her circle of friends bears the same family name as the human resource member who sent bailiffs and a police officer after me and got me banned from the entire mall.  Could the DTA possibly have friendship ties with the Save-on-Foods head office??  If this is true, then it's no bloody wonder the punishment was ruled so lopsidedly against me.  Also, everyone involved in my situation, other than the DTA, has been reprimanded, including the displacement of the 2018 store manager, who failed to keep this situation under control.  This is yet, another reason to suspect the DTA's head office ties.

Moving back to my first thought, if she was blaming her actions on the death-threat manager's orders to her as an excuse for death-threatening me then I would once again, like to make a reference to her most recent harassment towards me in 2018.  The 2014 manager was long gone in 2018.  This shows that she was doing this under her own free will and that her involvement in the death-threat incident was also under her own free will.  If that wasn't enough to support my point, after she reported me for publicizing her real name on my blog, she came downstairs from the office meeting she had with the 2018 store manager, walked towards me, forced unwanted eye contact with me, and sustained a prolonged smile like she thought it was funny that she had gotten me in trouble.  Basically, she was taunting me.  Obviously, she's not sorry at all for what she did to me.  She's only sorry that she got caught for doing what she did.  She will stir the drink again if she continues to get the lenient and favoured treatment.

The 2014 Death-Threat Manager Has Been Removed

Please recall that in May 2019, I filed a major complaint to the people of Save-on-Foods H.R. after I had felt hopeless filing a grievance with my then union rep.  Head office's refusal to help me led to me disclosing these incidents.  A few things happened in the subsequent months.

My grievance stated that the fake private investigator's harassment towards me had a huge part in the reason why I revealed the death-threat accomplice's name in this post.  At the start of June, the fake private investigator went on a 6-month hiatus from work because he did this to me.  Shortly after H.O. read my "Wolf Crier" post, the girl that the fake P. I. used to falsely accuse me of sexual harassment towards her (to get me fired to avenge his humiliation that I supposedly caused him), went on an indefinite sick leave in which she is still currently on.  The timing of her leave of absence coincided too impeccably with the fake P.I.'s suspension to believe that it wasn't related to the fake P.I.'s antics.

In August, a couple of things happened.  There was a tweak in the Frontrunners' personnel roster, involving the staff member who was involved in the death-threat agenda.  There was a specific reason given for her resignation and it would've been an afterthought in any other circumstance.  However, roughly a week beforehand, the 2014 death-threat manager was no longer head-managing his then-assigned store.  I have not heard anything about him head-managing another Overwaitea Food Group store since.  There are several things that could've happened:

• He took a head office job
• He got demoted to a lesser role
• He retired under his own free will
• He got fired or was forced into resignation

Knowing that Save-on-Foods will complain to the employer housing a staff member who harasses a Save-on-Foods team member, I'd have to suspect that her resignation from the Nanaimo Frontrunners was involuntary, even though I could be wrong.

If Save-on-Food's H.O. team wants to change our perception of the company supporting criminal activity, then I hope that THAT manager was indeed terminated from the company altogether and that the death-threat accomplice will also be terminated.  This is taking into consideration that I will not ever be able to return to Save-on-Foods as a shopper and as a working employee.  The emotional and situational damage has already been done so much so that it'd be hard for me to reconsider that notion.

The Fake P.I. Got Himself Fired!

Late February 2020, the fake private investigator got terminated from the Country Club Save-on-Foods in Nanaimo, BC.  Apparently, there were 2 other deli clerks who management wasn't very pleased about and wanted to catch them possibly doing something condemnable by surprise.  Instead, the fake P.I. was caught for his wrongdoing that was adequate for his immediate termination.

Internal theft & food sampling in the store are the 2 misconducts that will get an employee fired without any ifs, ands, or buts.  The fake P.I. told one of his former co-workers that he got caught eating some food belonging to the deli department.  I think he did something else.  It has been mentioned that he was asked about a prior infraction, admitted to it, and then he did that exact same thing again.

He was asked to go on a 6-month hiatus from work starting last May after I had notified the human resources department that he prevented me from holding the D.T.A. accountable without breaking company rules.  He obviously got suspended for intoxicating the environment back then.

My guess is that he got caught by surprise for "spreading hate" again.  Why else would his pull-up to the boardroom running over 3 hours long, involving a head office member, who would have to take a several-hour trip from the mainland to Vancouver Island?  Just as this fake P.I. had been lying to me and lying about me to other co-workers (to create a rebellion against me), he was as probable of trying to lie his way out of termination for the entire duration of that meeting.

Knowing that the company has finally held someone relating to my situation accountable is therapeutic.  For those of you who have been following my blog closely, you would understand my need to disclose this piece of news.  You all deserve to know, especially for those who have been checking in daily to blank updates.  It looks as though the Fake P.I. got out-faked at his own game.  😆😆😆

Two Pairs of Shoes - Nike & Saucony

In November of last year, I came across two pairs of shoes.  First, I ran into a shopping woman who just happened to be wearing some Nike Lunar Fingertrap TR (men's).  She's a sneakerhead herself so she totally understood my passion.  Later on that day, I picked up a pair of Saucony Cascadias.  I'm pretty sure these are the originals as I couldn't find anything like this online.  These are super rare if you ask me.  The cashier reacted:  "What are these - Spiderman shoes?"  I just smiled but he was right.  These are pretty fancy looking, which is why I bought them (to add to my collection).

There are more than 2 poses in this collage.  Can you spot them?

Did you know that this collage was Remembrance Day inspired?  I was thinking about fine-tuning this collage to post on November 11, 2019, but I couldn't quite get my creative mind in the right place in time.  So sorry...